Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Systematic Health & Safety for Production-MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theSystematic Workplace Health Safetyfor Production. Answer: The Safety Works Maine, (2013) maintains that in most of the organizations, the Workplace Health and Safety program will target the production function and quality control. In our organization, much emphasis of the healthy and safety program is concentrated on production and quality control. The organization believes that a successful safety and health system should meet the following requirement; The ability of the managers to commit themselves fully to ensure the program work, The workers/employees set out in the whole program, A system to identify and control hazards. This is basically the hazard identification and risk assessment, Compliance with the OSHA regulations, Safe work practices training, A conducive climate to safety that is enhanced by mutual respect, caring and open communication, and Continuous improvement. (Eva Associates 2012) presented that other needs of the organization in regard to the program may also include setting out procedures or processes to achieve training and supervision of workers, incident management, emergency planning, and risk mitigation. Basically the purpose of the system is to maintain a safe and health workplace. This helps in improving the organizations work environment. The organization is able to have a chance to reflect its business culture, the hazard within the workplace and its also able to handle the safety of its workers more effectively. Just as the organization practices, (eds. Pearse et al. 2001, p. 146) maintains that the purpose of such a program is to continually minimize or eliminate risk. The organization maintains that the employees need to be trained, develop increased awareness of the program and competence so that the health and safety is achieved. (Health and safety Authority 2006, p. 21) Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Template Activity description: Conducted by: Date: Step 1: Hazard identification Biological Bodily Fluid/Blood Virus/disease Hygiene Other details Critical incident resulting in: Lockdown Evacuation Disruption Other /Details Environment Extreme Temperature Exposure to Sun Noise Water Creatures Weather Other Hazards/Details Step 2: Risk Assessment Level Likelihood Consequence/outcome (Scale of Low-High) Insignificant Minor Moderate Major critical Highly Likely Likely Unlikely Step 3 Risk control In this step we just need to prepare a table then enter the following information Identification of the hazards is done The risk level should be rated using the information contained in step 2 Writing the control measures so that to implement elimination or minimization of the risk following the set standards and procedures. Step 4: monitoring and reviewing controls Can be completed any period(i.e. ongoing basis or after basis) Yes No 1. Are there sufficient control measures for minimization of the risk? 2. Has anything changed in accordance to the control measures? 3. Do we require any further control measures in a period to come? Details: Completed by: Designation Signature Date After testing the template and evaluating it, I found it was successful in identification of various hazards and risks which brought a chance of finding other minor ones which could expose workers to danger though very hard to notice for example hazard like Manual Tasks which involve things like working heights and restricted area. We were able to assess the level of risk practically after which we had to change priority of controlling some since some were even unlikely to occur though earlier I had categorized them as likely. Controlling of the risks became easier since I had categorized them in accordance with preferred hierarchy of control through some methods such as elimination, substitution, redesign, isolation and administration. The positive performance indicators were that the workers participated in implementing it. Improvements required are that we need further control measures in future and we needed to deal with the changes to the planned control measures. The organizati on was able to find that it needed further control measures in future Some barriers to introducing WHSMS into an organization as Ed. Pearse et al. (2001, pp. 237-238) includes the application of traditional management approach which tends to have lower integration of the various departments. This can be overcome by having a management system approach. The second barrier is inadequate time and resources. In order to overcome this barrier, some changes may be required in the organization in terms of leadership and personnel. The third barrier is the application of bureaucratic procedures. Unnecessary bureaucratic procedures may have to be eliminated in order to allow efficient running of the program. The fourth barrier is that some programs may work in another organization and not in another based on the size of the organization. This would be overcome by determining which system suits the organization by matching with the available resources, safety regulations, and industrial risks. Another major barrier is the complexity of some systems. This may be o vercome by having the necessary resources and expertise in place before implementing the program. There are various types of topics which are discussed in the WHS Act 2011 which include: Health and safety duties this covers the duties of the business, the management and even the employees towards achieving heath and safety. Incident notification which evaluates the various types of incidents that are common in the workplace and describes how they can be reported. Authorization deals with requirements for authorization or work places, requirements for authorization of plant or substance, requirements for authorization of work, among others. Consultation, representation and participation- this topic covers the consultation with workers and their representatives. It actually aims at fulfilling the duties of the various parties that are involved. Discriminatory, coercive and misleading conduct; covers the various violations that may sabotage the program and sets out ways of how they are to be solved. References Eva and Associates, 2012, WHS/OHS safety management systems, viewed on 24 May 2017, https://www.evaandassociates.com.au/content/whsohs-safety-management-systems Health and Safety Authority, 2006, Workplace safety and health management, HSA, Hogan Place, Dublin. Pearse, W, Gallagher, C Bluff, L (eds.) 2001, Occupational health safety management systems: proceeding of the first national conference, Crown Content, Melbourne, Victoria. Safety Works Maine, 2013, Managing safety and health, viewed on 24 May 2017,https://www.safetyworksmaine.gov/safe_workplace/safety_management/ Work Heath and Safety Act 2011 (Pco), viewed on May 24 2017, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00887

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.